05/01/2022
Share 

Law change allows wild birds to be killed to protect gamebirds

99b40f01-cc1c-4c8f-8b30-9814894859e9

Some wild birds can now be killed in order to protect game birds bred for shooting in England, after the government updated guidelines on its general licences.

The new licences have been issued for two years rather than one, with government officials saying this is to provide "stability and certainty" to shooters. There has been debate over whether pheasants, partridges and grouse count as livestock, as they are wild birds, and so whether predators can be shot in order to protect them.


Wild birds can now be shot in order to protect released gamebirds (Peter Miles).

Content continues after advertisements

DEFRA has released a new definition of "livestock" including these birds, to give explicit permission to shoot Carrion Crows, Jackdaws, Magpies and Rooks. It reads: "'Livestock' is as defined in section 27(1) of the 1981 [Wildlife and Countryside] Act. For the purpose of this licence, this expression also includes game birds kept in an enclosure or which are free roaming but remain significantly dependent on the provision of food, water or shelter by a keeper for their survival. This does not include supplementary feeding."

A DEFRA spokesperson said the change was made after gamekeepers asked for more clarity about whether game birds counted as livestock. The new language makes it clear that wild predatory birds cannot be shot under this licence in order to protect wild game birds that are not dependent on food and shelter from humans, but they can be shot under the licence if they are.

Conservation groups raised concerns that the update could mean an increase in the killing of wild birds. The RSPB's head of site conservation policy, Kate Jennings, said: "If this update to the livestock general licence goes beyond a reclassification of terminology and implies that it will lead to an increase in the killing of wild birds to protect game bird interests, then given the nature and climate emergency we find ourselves in, this would be a massive backward step for nature conservation in this country."