Home
 
 

Research Nestboxes are inadequate substitutes for natural tree cavities

 
 

This page contains 1 reader comment. Click here to view (latest Mon 06/03/17 10:44).

A new study has suggested that, in many instances, nestboxes are not an adequate substitute for naturally occurring tree cavities.

The study, published in Forest Ecology and Management, found that microclimatic conditions varied between nestboxes and natural cavities, this in turn having an effect on their respective suitability for different tree-nesting species.

Measuring air temperature and relative humidity in vacant tree cavities previously used by Marsh Tits and in nestboxes provided specifically for the species, the researchers found that tree cavities were more efficient thermal insulators, with temperature extremes closer to the median values, while nestboxes produced a greater temperature range.

Marsh Tit
Marsh Tits show a preference for natural breeding sites, despite the provision of artificial imitations (Photo: John Caswell)

Mean daily relative humidity reached an average of 90 per cent in tree cavities, up to 24 per cent higher than in nestboxes at comparable ambient conditions (76–78 per cent relative humidity).

Co-author Marta Maziarz explained: "The main message from the study is that nestboxes cannot replicate tree cavities.

"The nestboxes do not insulate well but they are generally warmer and they are drier. They are not bad; they are just different. This has consequences for the birds."

The study, which was conducted at two woodland sites (one in the UK and one in Poland), found that different species showed different preferences for either natural or artificial nest sites. Some, such as Great Tit, favoured the provided nestboxes while others, particularly Marsh Tit, showed clear preferences for tree cavities — even when nestboxes were strategically positioned to mimic natural holes.

Dr Maziarz highlighted the diversity of natural cavities as a key factor when considering conservation measures for woodland. She explained that it is better to protect mature trees with a greater number and range of available cavities which in turn offer potential sites to a greater range of species — not just birds, but also to other animals, such as bats.

However, nestboxes are undoubtedly beneficial for the conservation of some species, with some observed population recoveries in Pied Flycatcher and Barn Owl largely thanks to the provision of artificial nest sites.

Reference

Maziarza M, Broughton R K & Wesolowskia T. 2017. Microclimate in tree cavities and nest-boxes: Implications for hole-nesting birds. Forest Ecology and Management, vol 389, pp 306–313. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.01.001

Related articles

Research Breeding swallows switch hemispheres Research Breeding swallows switch hemispheres
A new study has found that North American Barn Swallows are now proliferating in Argentina, having altered their entire annual cycle. read on read on
Research Royal revelations Research Royal revelations
Scientists and conservationists have confirmed the existence of a 'new' species of tern. read on read on
Research Slender chance of curlew rediscovery Research Slender chance of curlew rediscovery
Slender-billed Curlew has been considered extinct since the turn of the century, but stable isotope analysis has revealed that conservationists may have been searching in the wrong places for breeding sites. read on read on
Research Two undescribed bird species discovered in South Kalimantan Research Two undescribed bird species discovered in South Kalimantan
Two previously undescribed bird species have been discovered on the island of Borneo. read on read on
Research Climate change could deliver final blow for threatened species Research Climate change could deliver final blow for threatened species
A new study suggests that a quarter of threatened birds are already being negatively impacted by climate change and questions whether such adjustments could be the tipping point. read on read on


The information in this article was believed correct at the time of writing. BirdGuides accepts no responsibility for errors, or for any consequences of acting on information in the article. The opinions expressed are those of the author(s) and are not necessarily shared by BirdGuides Ltd.

hide section Reader comments (1)

#1
The sad thing is that our woodlands are in such a bad state that boxes are so often needed. In the 1980s I worked 260 acres of mixed woodland changing Pied Flycatcher from 6 pairs in natural holes to 98 in nest boxes in 6 years. Ancient woodland where natural holes occurred without nest boxes also showed an increasing population. This whole area did not have Pine Marten which would have had an effect on the numbers found.
   John Miles, 06/03/17 10:44Report inappropriate post Report 

Back to top Back to top

Latest edition Latest edition
Search articles Search articles
All articles All articles
Popular articles Popular articles
 
   
 
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Terms of Sale | Cookie Policy | About us | Advertise | Contact us
BirdGuides, Warners Group Publications PLC, The Chocolate Factory, 5 Clarendon Road, London N22 6XJ
© 2017 BirdGuides and Warners Group Publications plc. All Rights Reserved. Company Registered in England no. 2572212 | VAT registration No. GB 638 3492 15
Sales: or tel. 0800 919391 · International Sales: +44 (0)1778 391180 · Office: or tel. 020 8826 0934
 
   

Fatbirder's Top 1000 Birding Websites