Home
 
 

BOU to adopt IOC World Bird List

 
 

This page contains 7 reader comments. Click here to view (latest Mon 23/01/17 16:29).

The British Ornithologists' Union (BOU) has announced that it is to adopt the International Ornithological Congress (IOC) World Bird List for all its ornithological needs, including the British list, from 1 January 2018.

This follows a detailed review by the BOU's Records Committee (BOURC), which involved inviting the four main global avian taxonomic authorities (eBird/Clements, HBW/BirdLife, Howard & Moore and IOC World Bird List) to each submit a proposal that could be assessed against agreed BOURC criteria and related questions.

Initially, the BOU Council appointed a delegation which discussed the merits of each proposal to help arrive at an informed view on behalf of Council. This delegation reviewed the proposals but did not consider there was any strong reason to make a recommendation for any of the candidate taxonomies ahead of a full meeting of BOURC.

BOURC subsequently met on 10 December 2016 and invited members of the Council delegation to attend, two of whom did so. The Council delegates engaged in discussions but had no vote in the process. It was expected a recommendation to BOU Council would be made as a result of the meeting. All members of BOURC, bar one, were present.

Hudsonian Whimbrel
Eurasian (upper left) and Hudsonian Whimbrels will be 'lumped' on the British list from next January (Photo: Brian Field)

Before discussing the taxonomic proposals in detail, the Committee considered two issues raised by those present. First, the need for and benefits of a unified global taxonomy were agreed upon. Second, it was agreed that the EU's current use of the HBW/BirdLife taxonomy would not be a material factor influencing the Committee's discussions.

The Howard & Moore proposal was discussed first as this was the only proposal for a taxonomic system which was not currently available online, and the Committee felt that accessibility of the new taxonomy to be adopted was important. With no online version envisaged until the next update (which was said to be some years away), the Committee concluded that this proposal would not be considered further.

In their respective submissions, the IOC World Bird List and eBird/Clements had stated their increasing collaboration, and their agreement that a single global taxonomy was desirable. On the latter point the International Ornithologists' Union (IOU) has stated that it intends to hold a session at IOC2018 in Vancouver, Canada, in August 2018 which will look at ways to progress to a unified global taxonomy.

This left the Committee with two alternatives: HBW/BirdLife on one side and IOC World Bird List and eBird/Clements on the other. Arguments were advanced in support of both alternatives, and the BOURC members at the meeting were evenly split between adopting either HBW/BirdLife or the IOC World Bird List. From a show of hands during which the Chair abstained, there were four votes on each side. Each member of the Committee then summarised his or her reasoning, and members were given the opportunity to reconsider their vote.

The outcome remained unchanged and so BOURC Chair, Andrew Harrop, used his casting vote to recommend that the BOU adopt the IOC World Bird List. It was made clear that one of the key factors in this decision was the expectation of a move towards a more unified global taxonomy, and in that respect the BOU should work with IOU/IOC to ensure that this happens.

In summarising his reasons for the recommendation, the Chair expressed the view that moving to the IOC World Bird List would be the most likely way of achieving a more unified global taxonomy, especially in light of the proposed meeting at IOC2018. He also stated that this move would be more in keeping with the BOU's previous approach to taxonomy, and in many quarters would have greater scientific credibility. BOURC will review the decision in five years' time.

British list: more gains than losses

BOURC's landmark decision to adopt IOC taxonomy will inevitably mean changes for its British list. Overall it would appear that the total of species recorded in Britain is likely to increase slightly, with a number of 'splits' recognised by IOC but not currently by BOU. For example, Isabelline (Lanius isabellinus) and Red-tailed (L phoenicuroides) Shrikes are considered two separate species, and Bean Goose becomes Taiga (Anser fabalis) and Tundra Bean Goose (A rossicus). Fea's Petrel (Pterodroma feae) and Desertas Petrel (P deserta) become two species. Thayer's Gull (Larus thayeri) is also recognised by IOC as a full species, and not as a subspecies of Iceland Gull (L glaucoides).

Tundra Bean Goose
IOC splits Tundra Bean Goose (pictured) from Taiga Bean Goose, which means an extra tick for British birders from next January (Photo: Jon Evans)

Two-barred Warbler (Phylloscopus plumbeitarsus) will be elevated to full specific status rather than continue as a subspecies of Greenish Warbler. Two other Far Eastern vagrants, Eastern Yellow Wagtail (Motacilla tschutschensis) and Stejneger's Stonechat (Saxicola stejnegeri), are also afforded full specific status, as is North America's Least Tern. Each of these will therefore become species additions to the revised British list.

Stejneger's Stonechat
Stejneger's Stonechat is one of several taxa that will be elevated to full species status when BOU adopts the IOC World Bird List from January 2018 (Photo: Matt Slaymaker)

However, one significant loss from the future British list is Hudsonian Whimbrel, which remains a subspecies of Whimbrel, despite a review of its taxonomic position. The redpoll complex is reduced from three species to two — Common and Arctic — meaning the loss of Lesser Redpoll as a species. IOC's handling of two taxonomic minefields, crossbills and subalpine warblers, remains in line with current BOURC treatment.

The information in this article was believed correct at the time of writing. BirdGuides accepts no responsibility for errors, or for any consequences of acting on information in the article. The opinions expressed are those of the author(s) and are not necessarily shared by BirdGuides Ltd.

hide section Reader comments (7)

#1
Does American Herring Gull remain as a separate species?
   Steve Lawton, 20/01/17 11:33Report inappropriate post Report 
#2
Very reasonable. The Tobias criteria used by HBW are somewhat random and subjective and they don't really allow for use of DNA technology as part of the evaluation.
   Mark Welfare, 20/01/17 11:36Report inappropriate post Report 
#3
@ Steve Lawton - yes, split by IOC too
   Michael P, 20/01/17 12:12Report inappropriate post Report 
#4
Easiest way to compare is on Avibase eg http://avibase.bsc-eoc.org/species.jsp?avibaseid=60F32AF8F5E3E40B
   Alastair Rae, 20/01/17 14:07Report inappropriate post Report 
#5
I didn't realise Seb Coe knew anything about taxonomy. Are we allowed to include Russian White-fronts or are they suspended due to doping allegations?

Doesn't look like the decision, based on an enthralling 4-4 draw with IOC winning on the toss of a coin, is based on anything remotely scientific, rather a shift of allegiance, so it's not a change in taxonomy, it's a change in diplomacy. This new-found spirit of international cooperation is tantamount to kicking sand in the face of Brexit birders. Britain invented birding for God's sake. We should be able to decide our own list.

Likewise, dismissing one candidate for not having their own particular brand of magic available online has nothing to do with taxonomy.

Armchair ticks and un-ticks duly made. In pencil. Rubber (or Eraser if you follow IOC) at the ready.
   Sean McCann, 21/01/17 11:48Report inappropriate post Report 
#6
Britain may have invented birding (or not) but, like football, cricket and DNA based technologies, this does not give us permanent first place! At least we look like recovering 1st place in rugby with luck. But even that is an international effort with Mr Jones in charge. Birds are transnational - decisions on taxonomy should be. Howard and Moore can be discounted as the work of just a few individuals and not updated more than about once a decade. Would you want treatment from your doctor who did not use any treatments invented in the last ten years? science moves fast!
   Mark Welfare, 21/01/17 22:38Report inappropriate post Report 
#7
And they didn't even consider UK400 Club taxonomy - Amazing!!
   Jeffrey Hazell, 23/01/17 16:29Report inappropriate post Report 

Back to top Back to top

Latest edition Latest edition
Search articles Search articles
All articles All articles
Popular articles Popular articles
 
   
 
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Terms of Sale | Cookie Policy | About us | Advertise | Contact us
BirdGuides, Warners Group Publications PLC, The Chocolate Factory, 5 Clarendon Road, London N22 6XJ
© 2017 BirdGuides and Warners Group Publications plc. All Rights Reserved. Company Registered in England no. 2572212 | VAT registration No. GB 638 3492 15
Sales: or tel. 0800 919391 · International Sales: +44 (0)1778 391180 · Office: or tel. 020 8826 0934
 
   

Fatbirder's Top 1000 Birding Websites